|
The Man Behind the World’s Most Famous
Collar
Roy McBride, inventor of the
Toxic collar, expresses his thoughts and tells of the collar’s crude
beginning.
Roy McBride has
spent a good part of his life hunting coyotes and it is ironic that
he has so much in common with his foe. Both McBride and the coyote
are crafty and successful at what they do.
McBride doesn’t have any personal grudge against coyotes or
other predators, it’s just that he feels ranchers should have the
right to protect their livestock.
“I think people having a problem with coyotes have the right
to do something about it,” said McBride. The West
Texas predator hunter who lives in Alpine is the
inventor of the famed toxic collar.
“I don’t think ranchers should be imposed upon by someone
else’s will who lives way off in a city or somewhere else,” he said.
“At the same time, it is not the duty of the taxpayer to kill the
rancher’s coyotes. It is the problem of the man and he should take
care of it but he shouldn’t be interfered with. That’s how I see
it—it’s real simple. Ranching is not mandatory. It is something you
do by choice and there are just certain problems related to the
business.”
McBride has found the people who do the best in the sheep
business are the ones who take care of their own problems. He said
most sheepmen are good predator hunters and most can take care of
their own problems without any help.
“It would help them a lot to have whatever tools they need
and not be interfered with,” he said.
McBride grew up trapping for furs and the valuable knowledge
he gained as a youngster led him early in life into a job with the
Fish and Wildlife Service as a government trapper and later as a
government lion hunter. He now operates his own predator control
business with the help of his sons Rowdy and Rocky, and his wife
Jerry and daughter Randy manufacture collars in the family’s shop
near their home. The collars are used by ranchers in several foreign
countries and for experimental use in the
U.S.
He expects them to be marketed commercially here as soon as the
government gives the okay.
“The future here in the United
States for the collar is terrific,”
he said. “It is inevitable that it will be used and I can’t see
anything but a good future. It has taken a long time to get where we
are with the collar and it has been opposed by the very groups that
I thought would have supported it.”
McBride said legally, the collar is approved and there are no
restrictions on it—the restrictions are on the toxicant.
“I could sell collars all over the
U.S.
if I wanted to. But 1080 is now in the registration proceedings and
I don’t know what the delay is. All of the legal obstacles have been
overcome,” he said.
“The collar had a rather crude beginning, McBride explained.
It originated back in the ‘60s when he was having trouble trapping a
particular coyote on a West Texas ranch. All
of the conventional methods were not working and he figured that if
he could cover the area on the sheep where the coyote usually bit,
he could get him.
“So I began to try to develop or hold a toxicant in place in
the area where the coyote was biting the sheep. Of course the first
ones (collars) were crude, but we got the coyote,” he said.
He originally developed the collar to sell commercially and
shortly after that—in 1972—President Nixon signed an executive order
banning the use of 1080.
“We tried other toxicants but found they were hazardous to
humans or has secondary effects on other types of animals,” he said.
“1080 was the only thing that really worked well.”
McBride’s experience using 1080 dates back to his days
working with the Fish and Wildlife Service when the toxicant was
used in bait stations. He has also worked with ranchers in
Mexico
who were using 1080 on their own. He knows it was very
selective.
“It is the logical thing to use in the collar because it is
odorless and tasteless and has no warning effects,” he said. “In
other words the coyote won’t turn loose of the collar because he can
feel himself being poisoned.”
McBride has worked in the predator control business
professionally for almost 30 years and many of those years have
involved working with 1080 in some fashion. He has seen 1080 used
successfully in
Mexico
to a broad extent and has never seen anyone hurt by using it.
“My experience is that it is a lot more selective than traps
and if used correctly is very selective on coyotes. The fact is when
you use it in the collar, you are only after the coyote that is
causing the problem,” he said.
The collars McBride manufactures now are going mostly to
South
Africa,
Canada,
and
Mexico.
In
Canada
and
Mexico,
1080 is used as a toxicant in the collar. In
South
Africa, ranchers started using 1080
but have switched to a common insecticide which will often kill the
jackal before he can kill the lamb. McBride has worked for several
years with South African ranchers who have serious problems with
jackals. Jackals, he said, are very similar to coyotes in most ways
but are slightly smaller.
Mexican and Canadian ranchers have problems with coyotes much
the same as those in the U.S. McBride has found problems in those
foreign countries are much like ours but laws in those countries are
more sensitive.
Laws in some other
countries McBride has dealt with do not allow traps or snares in
areas because in South
Africa, for example, there is a
danger of hurting antelope. Small antelope sometimes cross fences
through the same holes as jackals. McBride said officials in those
countries are generally objective and are trying to solve problems
while not wanting to create new problems by using tools that are not
selective. The collar has an immediate appeal to them because it was
something anybody could use, he said.
“You don’t have to
be trained to use the collar. We talk about training programs here
but farmers in South
Africa can buy collars directly
through the mail and use them without any kind of training,” McBride
said.
It is not only ranch
people that contract McBride’s services. Some environmental groups
have employed his assistance when doing work on endangered species.
He participated in a survey on the ocelot in
Texas and last year
his son Rocky caught some lions for the Guadalupe and
Carlsbad
National Parks. Radios
were put on the lions as part of a government study. At the time
this interview was conducted the McBrides were hunting mountain
lions as part of a study for
Texas
Tech
University.
After completing
that job, Roy was
leaving for Florida
where he was contracted by the Game and Fish Commission to catch
panthers in the Everglades for a team of
biologists who planned to monitor radios attached to the animals.
Asked about the
current population trends of some of the animals he hunts, McBride
said coyotes are expanding their range.
“They occur in
states east of the
Mississippi and are
now in North Florida. They are very abundant
animals and are adaptable,” he said.
McBride said coyotes
have been transplanted to some extent by people who have taken them
as pets and then released them. Hound men have turned them loose to
run with dogs and they do very well anywhere you put them, he
said.
As for mountain
lions, back in the 50s and the 60s they were very low in number
because of an intensive control financed by wool growers. Most of
the sheep have left the better lion habitat, so lions have really
come back, he said. For several years there wasn’t a financial
incentive to kill them, he explained, so now they are very common in
Texas.
click here to return to publicity
page |